Search for: "Stake v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 2,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Amanda Frost
The stakes are high: An undercount could lower federal funding and reduce representation for the states and localities affected. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:57 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
A news report in the Telegraph states:"At stake is the future livelihood of millions of Bengal and Odisha fishermen, for whom the settlement could open up miles of unchallenged open sea that both India and Bangladesh currently prevent each other from using for anything other than transit. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 7:43 am by Eric Goldman
United States last summer would provide clear guidelines on which types of online data access were permissible and which were not. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024,  holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  CAAF agreed, applying its decision in United States v. [read post]