Search for: "Standard Insurance Co" Results 161 - 180 of 5,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2013, 6:41 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the case styled, Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:50 pm by David Smith
Check that policy (and endorsement) wording carefully Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
In an interesting opinion in an intriguing case, California's Fourth District Court of Appeal summarized the law and applied it to its summary of the facts in American Modern Home Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
In the final days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court allowed a petition for review in Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
In the final days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court allowed a petition for review in Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:02 am by Bryce Angell
Co-pays and deductibles are usually standard in a health insurance policy. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
These clauses, which are now standard in most D&O insurance policies, address how the D&O insurance policy’s limits of liability are to be paid out so that the liabilities of the individual insureds are to be given priority and paid first. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:40 am by Brett M. Hill
  Washington State is very favorable to policy holders (contractors) because it applies a liberal standard in determining whether an insurer has a duty to defend a contractor. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:44 am
Premiums for people over 55 are $583 per month for the standard plan and $785 for the extended plan, plus deductibles and co-payments.This begs the question, if some consider PCIP to be unaffordable, how will anyone pay for health insurance once health insurance companies are required to take anyone and everyone? [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Co., 273 AD2d 766, 767 [3d Dept 2000]; Medical Facilities, Inc. v Pryke, 172 AD2d 338 [1st Dept 1991] (holding that insurer failed to meet the requirement of Insurance Law § 172 (now § 3407) by providing insured with proof of loss forms filled in with amounts instead of blank forms as required by statute)). [read post]