Search for: "Standard Steel, LLC" Results 161 - 180 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., LLC, 2020 WL 4698984, No. 1:17-cv-142-RJS-DAO (D. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
. *** Morris Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, LLC, and Prism Healthcare Group, Inc. (13-CA-42882; 348 NLRB No. 96) Morris, IL Dec. 29, 2006. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
.) *** Diverse Steel, Inc. and Pinnacle Steel, Inc., alter egos (26-CA-20799; 349 NLRB No. 90) Roland and Little Rock, AR April 30, 2007. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc v Folgers… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced license agreements should not be excluded… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee Solutions Inc v Folgers… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(not precedential) (Patently-O) BPAI’s standard of review of examiners’ rejections: Ex Parte Frye (Director's Forum) (Patently-O) Judge Rader accuses CAFC panel of ‘bias against non-technical arts’: Media Technology Licensing v The Upper Deck Co (271 Patent Blog) BPAI to HP: Equal protection clause doesn't save claims from 101: Ex parte Haines (12:01 Tuesday) District Court E D Texas: Evidence of litigation-induced license agreements should not be excluded… [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Proponents of rulemaking advocate “clear” rules to, in their view, reduce ambiguity, ensure predictability, promote administrability, and conserve resources otherwise spent on ex post, case-by-case adjudication.[6] To the extent they mean administrative adoption of per se illegality standards by rulemaking, it flies in the face of contemporary antitrust jurisprudence, which has been moving from per se standards back to the historical “rule of reason. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency today announced that High Steel Structures, Inc. and its sister company High Concrete Group, LLC, have settled alleged violations of toxic chemical reporting requirements at their plants in Lancaster, Williamsport and Denver, Pa. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:08 pm by Ben Vernia
  For example, rather than programming all the required standardized drug codes into its software, the company allegedly “hardcoded” into its software only the drug codes required for testing. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with J&J Cores LLC on alleged clean-air violations at the company’s secondary aluminum production facility at 2237 Oxford Township Road, Newcomerstown, Ohio. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by Barry Barnett
  The procedural and substantive guidance that courts of appeals have provided in Rule 23(f) appeals has shifted the law towards tougher certification standards. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm by admin
Certainly lawyers must steel themselves against recommending the “carcinogen” hazard identifications advanced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). [read post]