Search for: "Star v. Industrial Commission"
Results 161 - 180
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The content industries might be worried about the US tech giants, but the US tech giants will be looking East, at the astonishing growth of the likes of Baidu, JD.com and Albibaba. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
IPSO The Press Gazette reports on an IPSO ruling against the Daily Star in relation to a “hijab row” headline. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
In Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
See Star Fruits S.N.C. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
An unnamed EU Commission person made the sign of the cross and quoted liberally from the EC’s Safer Social Networking principles. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
, India: Mint story on patent loophole in India regarding the importation of generics: (Spicy IP), India: WHO lambasts Indian drug regulatory system: (Spicy IP), India: Minister to ensure that reduced excise duty to reflect in drug prices: (Spicy IP), India: SCC journal article ‘Intellectual property rights and the challenges faced by the pharmaceutical industry’: (Spicy IP), Poland: Trade marks for medicines: (Class 46), US: IPO publishes letter… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
Did the baseball star take steroids? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
FTC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
