Search for: "Starkes v. Marks"
Results 161 - 180
of 331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 3:44 am
In determining the existence of an attorney-client relationship, a court must look to the actions of the parties to ascertain the existence of such a relationship," (id., at 551 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]) [*8]bearing in mind that plaintiff's unilateral belief does not confer upon her the status of defendant's client (see Volpe v Canfield, 237 AD2d 282, 283 [2d Dept 1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 802 [1997]). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
INTA filed a brief in Nokia Corporation v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm
Today's opinion in Bond v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Zen Path LLC (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit: Holding on to a domain name to gain leverage in a business dispute can constitute cybersquatting: DSPT Int’l v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
To that list he now adds his own judicial biography of the man who successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
The case, Apple v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
In FDA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:23 am
She cited Crawford v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
He lost the power/politics struggle with Mark Kelly (relationship partner to dozens of big clients, Houston bar president, and future managing partner).UPDATE (11 PM): We’re hearing conflicting accounts about internal politics at V&E and Rabalais’s reasons for leaving, so we’ve stricken the second paragraph of the blockquote from the record.UPDATE (4/21/11): The $3 million figure might be off a bit, but we understand that Rabalais will get a significant raise… [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Turning to the alleged facts, Mitting J accepted that police officers observed red marks on Mrs Stocker’s neck two hours after the incident. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
On the European front, the European Union’s passage of The AI Act marks a significant milestone in AI regulation. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
" Very little in the way of case law helps us figure out a uniform test, despite the fact the Trade Secrets Act is a uniform act adopted everywhere now but New York, Massachusetts, and Texas.It is appropriate, therefore, to look elsewhere, including Judge Posner's opinion in Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
In SoftView LLC v. [read post]
