Search for: "State v. Ireland" Results 161 - 180 of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:53 am by Aoife O'Donoghue
Yesterday’s High Court decision, Doherty v Government of Ireland has resulted in global coverage of the Irish Government’s reluctance to engage with democracy. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 5:37 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: LectureAlexis Mourre, For a Universal Standard for Conflicts Disclosures Case Comments John R Crook, Kimberly-Clark Dutch Holdings, BV, Kimberly-Clark SLU, and Kimberly-Clark BVBA v Venezuela Andrés Mazuera, Glencore v Colombia: A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidence Patrick Leonard, Patrick Costello v the Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General: Obstacles to the Ratification of CETA in the Irish Constitutional… [read post]
The DPC states that the Decision may expose that other US exports to FISA702 electronic communications service providers who “may fall foul of the requirement of Chapter V GDPR “; but that it is not open to the DPC to suspend such transfers generally – each case would have to be assessed and ruled on separately. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:41 pm
That section, as originally enacted, applied only to the interception of messages being transmitted by the then state monopoly, Telecom Ãâ [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm by sarahjaneewart
IN THE COURTS Northern Ireland Abortion Case The Supreme Court has ruled in R (on the application of A and B) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
In McKeogh v Facebook Ireland Limited et al, Record No. 2012/254P, High Court Ireland, May 16 2013, the Irish High Court came up with a novel solution – require the Internet intermediaries, in this case Google and Facebook, to order their experts to meet with the defamed person’s expert to come up with a solution that can be incorporated into a mandatory injunction. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:02 pm
Chamber), with introductory note by Ryan Vogel Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]