Search for: "State Court District 1"
Results 161 - 180
of 48,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 7:09 pm
Readers of our blog may recall a recent piece in which we discussed a Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”) lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm
It then sent the cases back to the district courts for further proceedings. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:57 am
First, the PWFA uses similar language to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), stating that a qualified employee is one who “with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:30 am
”[1] Under S.B. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
” Id. at *1. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
” Id. at *1. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The ruling upheld the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia that had previously found Houston County’s actions to be discriminatory under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, citing Bostock v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, via summary order, vacated a district court’s grant of Starbucks’s request to serve wide-ranging subpoenas on its rank-and-file employees in a 10(j) proceeding, a decision that may augur how appellate courts will view the emerging employer practice of seeking extensive rank-and-file state-of-mind discovery in future temporary injunction actions by the Government.In Leslie v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Indeed, thirteen states, have had these words removed from their ethical rules. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:37 pm
The petitioner was charged with violating 18 US Code § 1962 (d), 18 US Code § 1955, 18 US Code § 1958, 18 US Code § 1959(a)(5) and 18 US Code § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 12:08 pm
Amazon.com, Inc. (11th Cir. 2021), which the district court viewed as holding "(1) that 'donating money qualifies as expressive conduct' and (2) that 'except in perhaps the rarest of circumstances, no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not want to support.'": First, our decision there had nothing to do with race discrimination, and Supreme Court precedent indicates that… [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
District Judge Maryellen Noreika. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Proposal #1 would bring the Justices closer to the inferior courts, and to the people. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
” In January 2022, district staff asked management to approve a request for eviction, but it was never given to the district director to sign. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:12 pm
The appeals court agreed with the district court that “extraordinary circumstances” causing “necessary irreparable injuries” from state court criminal proceedings require the federal courts to intervene. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:06 pm
A recent case from the Middle District of Georgia looked at one exemption in particular – the administrative exemption. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
The district court and the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am
Supreme Court in the Phoebe Putney case (which was about FTC jurisdiction and the state-action doctrine) had to do with a merger to monopoly. [read post]
