Search for: "State in Interest of AB" Results 161 - 180 of 1,847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  States that regulate franchise offerings have broad discretion to interpret the disclosure requirements in the interest of fairness to prospective franchisees. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:15 am by Russell Knight
“No state shall make or enforce any law…without due process of law” U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:04 am
  However, some bills have already been introduced, including AB 83 (Lee & Kalra), which would enact the "Get Foreign Money Out of California Elections Act". [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Gore, there are a number of contexts in which federal courts give less than full Erie deference to state court determinations of state law because state law serves as the predicate for protecting some federal interest or right.Justice Alito raised a number of them in questioning Katyal. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Policymakers interested in increasing tax rates should recognize the unintended consequences of high taxation rates. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 7:42 pm by Gene Takagi
In May 2022, the Attorney General released proposed regulations implementing AB 488. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
The State of Georgia argued that the LIFE Act was not void ab initio under the Georgia constitution “because [according to the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am by Jeewon Serrato and Jamie Kim
The second part will discuss other state laws that similarly moderate social media content and how they compare to AB 587. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
The blue tick is currently offered to users “of public interest” at no charge as a mark of their notability and authenticity. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:01 am by Kyle Hulehan
Consider a basic carbon tax on all carbon emissions in the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm by Simon Lester
As the United States has explained, the requirement for applicability of Article XXI(b) is that the Member taking the action must consider that action necessary for the protection of its essential security interests. 113. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm by Simon Lester
As the United States has explained, the requirement for applicability of Article XXI(b) is that the Member taking the action must consider that action necessary for the protection of its essential security interests. 113. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm by Brian Turetsky
AB 2311 also allows for recovery of three times the amount of any GAP charges paid by the consumer for a violation by the seller or holder of the sales contract. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 8:09 am by Mindy Harris
  At base, this renders the CFL’s exemption for state-chartered banks meaningless. [read post]