Search for: "State of Delaware v. Redding." Results 161 - 180 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am by Phil Dixon
The plaintiff exited his car when the deputy approached, which the deputy felt was a “red flag. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Diane Barnes, Youngstown State University  Law, Religion, and Manumissions: Delaware and Slavery, Darlene Spitzer-Antezana, Prince George’s Community College  Slave Manumissions and Property Rights in Antebellum Kentucky, Andrea S. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 23 Conference)   Delaware Strong Families v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:19 pm by Bob Ambrogi
My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. [read post]
” [7] The Delaware Chancery Court has stated that “A director can be controlled by another if in fact he is dominated by that other party, whether through close personal or familial relationship or through force of will. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Bridgeport Fittings, Inc (Patently-O)  District Court Delaware: Enhanced damages warranted even though compensatory damages eliminated infringer’s profits from infringing sales: Power Integrations v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court Delaware: Infringement warrants permanent injunction but with 15-month ‘sunset provision’ to allow defendant time to introduce noninfringing product: B. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm by Jeralyn
Foster Equitable Drug Sentencing", in red letters, is the word "Complete. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]