Search for: "State of Michigan, ex rel"
Results 161 - 180
of 221
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 8:57 am
"The concurring opinion in State ex rel. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
See State ex. re. v Suthers. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:02 am
The concurring opinion in State ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:58 am
It remains one of the biggest cocaine busts in Michigan history. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
It remains one of the biggest cocaine busts in Michigan history. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
A putative intervenor will generally demonstrate a sufficient interest for intervention of right in a NEPA action, as in all cases, if 'it will suffer a practical impairment of its interests as a result of the pending litigation.' [Citing: California ex rel. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Santa Rosa Memorial Hosp.Docket: 10-283Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm
Michigan). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
In State ex rel. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
’s record for overruling personal injury lawsuits decided by the Michigan Supreme Court is radical, activist, and threatens both the stability of Michigan law and the actual and perceived integrity of the state’s legal process. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE EX REL. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
The Michigan appellate court affirmed, the Michigan Supreme Court denied review, and on federal habeas, the district court denied relief. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:16 am
The Taylor facts were relatively straightforward. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
” Ex parte David Lee Lewis, NO. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
