Search for: "State v Doles" Results 161 - 180 of 501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit:  As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths annually. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Their IIED and negligent hiring, supervision, training, and retention claims failed, however (Arredondo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
This memo will has obvious added consequences to state interpretation to this issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:25 am by Aaron Caplan
Dole (1987) (allowing Congress to condition receipt of federal highway funds on states raising their drinking ages to 21) and Craig v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
And folks this is an ordinary hard working family, not The Sun’s ‘Fat Dole Scroungers’. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
 The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
One difficulty is that, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
As the Court stated in Dole, the rules it lays out in that case apply to conditions on “th [read post]