Search for: "State v. Aaron Deal" Results 161 - 180 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
-sponsored talks for a peace deal in Libya have not yet lead to a united Libyan government, U.N. envoy Bernardino Leon has stated that he is optimistic about the possibility of a deal. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
 Here Sir Richard provides the raw material, in terms of a brightly-illustrated full colour 227 paragraph judgment, while Aaron provides the write-up. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Because we are lawyers, and we will spend a great deal of time defending the rights of our clients before tribunals set up for that purpose, it is critical to consider the role of courts and their relationship to law. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:36 am by SHG
From United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(I wasn’t really sure what the deal was here, although my uninformed guess is that the lawyer and Chan had tangled in the past, in correspondence or via email.) [read post]