Search for: "State v. Admire" Results 161 - 180 of 1,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
 Rather, the Court concluded, there was no clear statement that the Florida decision was grounded in any state doctrine separate from the federal constitutional precedent of Miranda v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
It is full of many different positions, some of which are quite admirable, even if they are minority posi [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Public.Resource.Org that dealt with eligibility of copyright protection, stating that the non-authoritative status of annotations indicated that the creation of the annotations would fall outside of legislative duties.And even more recently, she authored the long-awaited decision regarding the "Booking.com" service mark, in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for City of Hays v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
In closing, Admiral Swift urged states to abandon “might-makes-right” and return to the post-war rules based international system. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
For a copy of Ninth Circuit's decision (dated April 25, 2007), please use this link: Hudock v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:03 pm by Steve Vladeck
Opinio Juris has been running a useful "insta-symposium" on Monday's Supreme Court decision in Samantar v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:11 pm by Jarod Bona
The FTC has admirably been a strong proponent of applying the antitrust laws to state and local governments. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]