Search for: "State v. Advance Marketing Consultants, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) Climate change and Millenium Development Goals top agenda during UN Secretary General’s visit to WIPO (WIPO) Global - Trade Marks / Brands What every marketing department needs to know about trade marks (IP Spotlight) Forbes 2008 list of ‘Top-earning Dead Celebrities’ (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Trade mark protection, broadcast rights vital for sports, say stakeholders (Intellectual Property Watch) How many drafts… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
Spisak's cases, the federal courts' decisions to overturn the death sentences hinged on Mills v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Department of Justice and the South Coast Air Quality Management District announced that Lifoam Industries, Inc. will pay $450,000 in fines, claiming the company violated the federal Clean Air Act and state air quality laws at its polystyrene manufacturing facility at 2340 E. 52 Street in Vernon, Calif. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
The SEC’s active approach to enforce the New Marketing Rules sends a stern reminder to SEC-registered fund managers to remain diligent when preparing marketing materials. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Marketing will tell you that any competitor’s ad is bad. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
The Bank of Russia announced the development of the digital ruble and public consultations on its issuance on Oct. 13. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Concerning retiree-only coverage, the Preamble states: Although group health plans that have fewer than two participants who are current employees (such as retiree-only plans) are excluded from the requirements of Code chapter 100 (setting forth requirements applicable to group health plans such as portability, nondiscrimination, and market reform requirements), this exclusion does not apply to Code §§ 4375 and 4376 because these sections are in chapter 34; and For… [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),EU: Counterfeit medicines in the EU: a new consultation: (Class 46)Thailand US Trade Representative to ‘talk’ to Thai government: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), US: Cellectis SA files suit against Precision BioSciences, alleging infringement of two patents relating to materials used to make genome modifications in certain types of organisms: (IP Law360), US: PharmaBiotech IP Summit 28-30 May, Philadelphia will address… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The fast timeline for disclosing cyber incidents could lead to disclosures that are “tentative and unclear, resulting in false positives and mispricing in the market. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
Supreme Court held in Twombly v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Funding, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am
The Act itself does not define the term "carry on business," and the MOJ's Guidance merely states that this interpretation is subject to a "common sense approach". [read post]
