Search for: "State v. Alexander Branch" Results 161 - 180 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Orrin Hatch
To borrow from Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 78, the judiciary must remain the “least dangerous” branch. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:28 pm by Orrin Hatch
To borrow from Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 78, the judiciary must remain the “least dangerous” branch. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
Permanently paralyzing a President would undermine the virtues of decisiveness and “dispatch” that Alexander Hamilton associated with the executive branch. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:25 am by Sasha Volokh
—were designed for a government of three branches, not four. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am by Amanda Frost
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Brianne Gorod
–stage amicus brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
On August 27, revisiting its joint employer standard, a divided five-member panel of the NLRB reaffirmed the standard articulated by the Third Circuit’s 1981 decision in NLRB v. [read post]