Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 161 - 180
of 701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:09 am
The criteria set out by the Strasbourg court in Boultif v Switzerland (no.54273/00) [2001] ECHR 479 and Maslov v Austria (no. 1638/03) [2008] ECHR 546 were referred to. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
One such office was established in Ljubljana while monuments in certain parts of Slovenia fell under the administration of the offices in Graz (present-day Austria) and Pula (present-day Croatia). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
One such office was established in Ljubljana while monuments in certain parts of Slovenia fell under the administration of the offices in Graz (present-day Austria) and Pula (present-day Croatia). [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 2:35 am
At present, several states, and among them Austria, are trying to stem the refugee tide by unilateral measures. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:33 pm
The Second Circuit makes no mention whatsoever of this activity, nor does it recognize the retroactive application of the FSIA as affirmed by the Supreme Court in Austria v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Budvar opposed, citing the following alleged prior rights: (i) a figurative Bud mark effective for ‘all types of light and dark beer’, in Austria, Benelux and Italy; (ii) the appellation of origin ‘Bud’, registered under the Lisbon Agreement in respect of beer, and effective in France, Italy and Portugal; (iii) an Austrian appellation of origin ‘Bud’ protected in Austria under a bilateral convention with the former state of… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:13 pm
As a general matter, the Court recalls that in an action brought on the basis of Article 226 EC, it is for the Commission to prove the existence of the alleged infringement and to provide the Court with the information necessary for it to determine whether the infringement is made out, and the Commission may not rely on any presumption for that purpose (see Case C-287/03 Commission v Belgium, paragraph 27, and Case C-428/04 Commission v Austria, paragraph 98). [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:01 am
Secretary-General Benjamin V. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
The decision in Oostergal and Laurentius v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:46 am
On March 15 the ECtHR, sitting as the Grand Chamber,decided on the Naït-Litman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:53 am
Austria and Commission v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:29 am
In the case, OBB Personenverkehr AG (OBB) v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 4:43 pm
Austria [2007] ECHR 79 [33]). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
Austria. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
In reestablishing the wide margin of appreciation for states, the Court rolled back on its much-criticised decision in Frodl v Austria. [read post]
