Search for: "State v. Bagley"
Results 161 - 180
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
Detective Corey Bagley regarding Card. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
New Relists Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Bagley, Judge, Superior Court, Bell-Forsyth Judicial Circuit, Cumming, Hon. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm
Bagley, 2010 U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Bagley"Robert C. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Bagley"Robert C. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bagley, No. 06-3471 In a criminal case, collateral estoppel may only be invoked by the accused. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Bagley, No. 05-3719 In a capital habeas proceeding, the denial of Petitioner's habeas petition is affirmed, where the state supreme court did not unreasonably apply federal law in holding that Petitioner's counsel was not ineffective during the penalty phase of the trial, as the evidence counsel allegedly failed to uncover would have been cumulative. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
” As Nick Bagley writes today regarding that statement: "Your jaw should be on the floor. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
In 1954, the United States Supreme Court ordered the public schools desegregated "with all deliberate speed" by 1956 in Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bagley, No. 05-4461 I'n a capital case in which petitioner was convicted of murdering his sons as they lay sleeping, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where state courts' rejection of a claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance during the penalty phase of the trial by failing adequately to investigate his mental-health history and background, was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In Texas v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
