Search for: "State v. Bare"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
S/he could face a possession claim for which they would, as a bare trespasser, have no defence. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
”) United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 7:58 pm
Using Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Moreno and Cleburne v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Before Goodridge v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:59 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
Rodriguez, a judge has dismissed the RIAA's "boilerplate" complaint for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.I.e., the decision is in agreement with the defendants' arguments in Elektra v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
The standard for disapproving a SIP revision -- that the revision would interfere with the CAA -- surely requires more than the EPA's bare conclusion. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
But in many states, crimes are charged alleging only the bare facts of the main offense. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm
Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 11:13 am
In its Thursday editorial, Common Sense and Private Property, the New York Times barely conceals its derision for both the property owners who instituted takings claims in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:36 am
iStock_000000130176.jpg In child pornography prosecution, detective's lay or expert testimony that images on the defendant's computer media satisfied the legal definition of child pornography was not helpful to the jury since it was only a "bare conclusion"; however its admission was not plain error based on the defense concession in closing argument that the photos were pornographic and that the defense only denied producing the photos, in United… [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:14 am
PipeBomb.jpg In prosecution for conspiring to make and making a pipe bomb, demonstrative video showing three tests, played at three different speeds, was probative to show the devices were "destructive devices" and were not unfairly prejudicial based on the "bare allegation" that the bombs in the video were significantly different than the charged devices, in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:44 pm
The Fifth Circuit Upholds an Overbroad Cell Phone Search In United States v. [read post]
