Search for: "State v. Bates"
Results 161 - 180
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 3:35 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
Chavakula v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:30 pm
In Bates v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Cairns v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
Bates v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:41 pm
Prothonotary Morneau applied the six-part test set out in a 1998 decision, Reading & Bates Construction v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:35 pm
Bates, 2006 WL 3813758 (E.D. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
The Recalibration of Colonel Brock: D.C. Circuit Ruling for J6 Rioter Could Impact Hundreds of Cases
3 Mar 2024, 4:01 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
" FEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
’” Bd. of Trs. of State Univ. of N.Y. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
United States and Thole v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
In support of his contention that the LVT could entertain such a challenge within its jurisdiction Mr Bates relied on Jonathan Parker LJ in Ruddy v Oakfern Properties [2006] EWCA Civ 1389: In my judgment there is no justification for implying any restriction in the entirely general words of section 27A of the [Landlord and Tenant Act 1985]. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:35 pm
Bates and an unfortunate wife’s Fitbit in State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” In the Heritage Foundation’s SCOTUS 101 podcast, Elizabeth Slattery and Tiffany Bates “look at the justices’ attendance at the State of the Union, and they talk about Trump’s judicial nominations with [the Judicial Crisis Network]’s Carrie Severino. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
