Search for: "State v. Beard" Results 161 - 180 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Curran, a deputy attorney general from Little Rock, arguing for the state in the case of Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm by cdw
Likewise, unsuprisingly, the Court GVR’d in Beard v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm by Helen Alvare
Hobbs (upholding a Muslim prisoner’s half-inch beard) and Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hobbs — legality under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of a prison system’s ban on an inmate’s half-inch beard, grown for religious reasons (Grant of review limited to question as written by the Court) Dart Cherokee Basin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
  At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:50 am by Amy Howe
  Alia Beard Rau reports for The Arizona Republic. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"Several justices picked up on the perversity of a federal rule that encourages states to make rigid cut-offs rather than having flexible rules, continuing the theme from Beard v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:48 pm by James M. Beard
Thursday,  the Coast Guard airlifted an injured crewman from the F/V America’s Finest. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31607 (ND NY, March 8, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge concluded that challenges by a corrections officer to a Muslim inmate's right to wear a beard did not impose a substantial burden on the inmate's ability to practice his religion.In Williams v. [read post]