Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 161 - 180
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
" Sinclair v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
Parker allowed the taking of a non-blighted department store in a blighted area because the government had adopted a legitimate end, in this case, slum eradication, and could use any means to fulfill it. (3) In Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
In July 2009, real parties Peter Plotkin et al., filed a suit against the City for inverse condemnation and damages due to condemnation blight. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:13 am
The Court of Appeals' 6-1 decision upholding the taking: Goldstein v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
V Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 241 (1984)). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
As the lawyers took aim at overturning Plessey [sic] v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
In his historic 2008 case, Boumediene v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 7:02 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp., No. 178 (Nov. 24, 2009). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
State laws may impose additional requirements that are not preempted by the act. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Corp., 921 N.E.2d 164 (N.Y. 2008) (the other Atlantic Yards case; the NY Court of Appeals treats -- or, more accurately, doesn't treat -- blight designations under state law). 49 Wb, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
That may not be healthy for the State. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
Many state supreme courts have adopted a similar approach under their state constitutions, permitting private-to-private takings for the purpose of eliminating severe blight, but forbidding them in most other situations.It is not unusual for the Supreme Court to significantly narrow the scope of a precedent without completely overruling it. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:37 pm
Mississippi is one of only seven states that has not enacted any eminent domain reforms at all since the Supreme Court’s decision controversial decision upholding “economic development” takings in Kelo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:26 pm
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
Speech at University of Mississippi School of Law on Eminent Domain Referendum Initiative Measure 31
6 Oct 2011, 12:07 pm
But that is much more restrictive than the state’s current blight law. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
While, certainly, not all members of these groups are poor or politically weak, a disproportionately large number are.Finally, in Part III I explain why the problem of abusive takings persists despite the wave of state reform laws adopted in response to the Supreme Court’s unpopular decision upholding economic development takings in Kelo v. [read post]
