Search for: "State v. Brand" Results 161 - 180 of 6,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:23 am by Arent Jan Oskam
Petrol stations are paid to display these dispensers on their counters, in favor of other brands. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Contents include: Jacco Bomhoff, Agatha Brandão de Oliveira & Lucia Bíziková, Post-war yearning for deparochialisation and the siren of free trade: The Bremen v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
  AVP asserts that JKH Enterprises did not "consider fully" the decision in Interstate Brands v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Ladislav Zdút v EUIPO concerned a trademark for a figurative mark for the brand "NEHERA" (EUTM 11794112), which was applied for and registered in 2013-2014, including a number of different types of goods such as clothing and footwear. [read post]
Two years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case of Pliva v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
While most are familiar with Batson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
They are now commonly referred to as “Soviet brands”. [read post]