Search for: "State v. C. D. H." Results 161 - 180 of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:43 am by Lovechilde
" Answers: (a) Groucho; (b) Mitt; (c) Mitt; (d) Groucho; (e) Mitt; (f) Groucho; (g) Mitt; (h) Groucho; (i) Mitt; (j) Groucho; (k) Groucho; (l) Mitt; (m) Mitt; (n) Groucho; (o) Groucho; (p) Mitt; (q) Mitt; (r) Groucho; (s) Mitt; (t) Groucho; (u) Groucho; (v) Mitt Groucho [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(d)          Fourthly, could a partnership be a defendant to a civil action brought under section 3 of the Act? [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Wrongfully destroying, sinking, stranding or causing the loss of a vessel at sea; d. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
The question — should this be read as employees involved in (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, (h) packing for shipment, or (i) distribution of those products — a broad interpretation, favored by the employer — or (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, or (h) packing for shipment or distribution of those… [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Los derechos concedidos al pueblo o “the people” – según establecidos en la Primera, Segunda, Cuarta, Novena y Décima Enmienda de la Constitución. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]