Search for: "State v. C. L."
Results 161 - 180
of 6,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Chin Edward L. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
Hays, and C. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
EU On 21 December 2023, the CJEU issued judgement in the case of Krankenversicherung Nordrhein (C-667/21). [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 7:55 am
DynCorp Int’l v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 1:10 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
From Keisel v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
We previously discussed the case, which became a cause célèbre for many on the left and the right after Mark and Patricia McCloskey of St. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Cameron (@JasmineDCameron) Trump – Intelligence Community Trump’s States Goals for the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
From State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
The OPM Debarment Process – Responding to an FEHBP Debarment or Suspension Action in 2024 (December 20, 2023): Most health care providers and suppliers are familiar with the fact that as a participating provider in the Medicare and / or Medicaid programs, certain criminal convictions, adverse licensure actions, and various types of prohibited conduct may subject the provider to exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs[1] by the… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
December dates The L&RUK Annual Quiz was posted yesterday, and the answers will be given on Saturday 30 December. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The EDPS here referred to the judgment in Case C-70/88 Parliament v Commission, which held that the Court must ‘be able to maintain the institutional balance and, consequently, review the observance of the Parliament’s prerogatives when called upon to do so […] by means of a legal remedy’ (para. 23). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
" Int'l Paper Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
