Search for: "State v. Calvin" Results 161 - 180 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
Quarterman [f/k/a Ted Calvin Cole] (prior coverage here) and Brewer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:55 pm by Jeff Gamso
 The Supreme Court laid out the basic test in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:07 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
The Ministerial exception in US case law On 28 March 2011 the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Perich v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Calvin Johnson For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.Michael Klarman’s The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford 2016) is an opponent’s history of the adoption of the American Constitution. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:40 am
TRÉSOR itself owes much to two earlier perfumes: Calvin Klein's ETERNITY and Sophia Grosjman's EXCLAMATION. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:40 am by Rick Hasen
  Eugene Volokh predicts the Court will hear the case and reverse, and Calvin Massey predicts a summary reversal. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
And in 1926, Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft said in Myers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
And Chafetz admits this: [Biden] sa[id] that "Article I of the Constitution defines the role of the vice president of the United States, that's the Executive Branch. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
"  Scalia flatly states:  "It doesn't. [read post]