Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
___________Whatever the outcome, and however one comes to the proceedings and the characters that have been called upon to play their roles on the stage of the ICJ, this is an event that ought not to be missed, not just for the historically embedded narratives swirling around the interpretive shoals of the constitution of a the policed boundaries of human taboos but of the concoction of singular responsibility for a tragedy to which all may, in some way, be complicit. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am
In its application, South Africa emphasizes the jus cogens nature of the prohibition against genocide as well as the erga omnes and erga omnes partes character of the obligations owed by States under the Genocide Convention. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
Baez v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 8:35 pm
Their stated mission back in 2015 was to develop AI for the good of humanity, not to maximize profits. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
State Coll. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm
Morgan v Townsend, 2023 WL 5689342 (ME 9/5/2023). [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
In McCloskey v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Mark McCloskey, Pardoned for Brandishing Guns at Protesters, Can't Get the Guns Back
26 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm
In Fay v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Omnicom Grp., Inc., 852 F.3d 195, 200 (2d Cir. 2017) (finding plausible discriminatory intent where a supervisor explicitly stated that an openly gay plaintiff “must have AIDS” because he was “effeminate and gay”; Sassaman v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Cramer v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The Court affirmed the lower courts' rulings.Citing Public Officers Law §87[2][a] and Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
