Search for: "State v. Charles K. B."
Results 161 - 180
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
The entire program has been created under the leadership of K. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
The entire program has been created under the leadership of K. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am
Charles K. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vázquez (Georgetown), Ingrid B. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Charles J. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
The clarified standard for rule 12(b)(6) motions adopted here will apply to any amended complaint that the plaintiffs may file.Iannacchino v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
D/B/A PUMP IT UP! [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
New Jersey: New Jersey Family Law by Charles C. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Salem, MA; Sonia Penta, President) B & H Properties Group, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Dent Schott-van den Eynden Professor Case Western Reserve University School of Law B. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Quincy, MA; Michael Foster, President) B&L Industries, Inc. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
B Fulton MO-Missouri 93 TOWN & COUNTRY S. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:00 am
Aubrey K. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:47 am
Merrill v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The only way to ensure that this does not occur is to preempt the state law standard for setting compensation. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Fisch Professor of Law University of Pennsylvania Law School Merritt B. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US Patents Congress weighs patent specialisation for federal judges (Ars Technica) (Inventive Step) (Law360) (IP Spotlight) (Patent Prospector) M Lemley & B Sampat’s report ‘Examiner Characteristics and the Patent Grant Rate’ – experienced examiners allow more, cite less (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) PTO problems are not new; the more things change, the more they stay the same (Inventive Step) Peer to… [read post]
