Search for: "State v. Christian" Results 161 - 180 of 3,738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
The Court stated that its judgment does not favour sexual orientation over religious belief – had the respondents refused rooms to the appellants because of their Christian beliefs, the appellants would have been equally protected by the prohibition of discrimination. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court stated that its judgment does not favour sexual orientation over religious belief – had the respondents refused rooms to the appellants because of their Christian beliefs, the appellants would have been equally protected by the prohibition of discrimination. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:02 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Respondents’ suit does not fall within the narrow exception to the rule against taxpayer standing established in Flast v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:29 am by Immigration Prof
Although in the 1990s California was a trendsetter in tough immigration measures (with Proposition 187 a sterling example), it is not one of the 26 states that has sued the U.S. government in Texas v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Laws that reflect Christian moral views on contested issues is yet another of the privilege that Christians have long enjoyed in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:41 pm
Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]