Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 161 - 180 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am by Eric Goldman
The Communications Decency Act is not a basis for summary judgment for defendants. * Eberhart v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
G & G states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
Joe Hand Promotions, a commercial distributor of sporting events, states that it was granted exclusive rights to distribute via closed-circuit telecast the Ultimate Fighting Championship ("UFC") fight between Jon Jones and Rashad Evans, which Joe Hand Promotions asserts was broadcast nationwide on April 21, 2012. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The defendant is a perfume and cosmetic distributor based in Italy. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Historically, American law has divided operators of communications systems into three categories—publishers, distributors, and conduits—and has set up different standards of liability for each. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Patent No. 8,472,999 on a "method and system for enabling dual standby state in a wireless communication system. [read post]
Gun distributors also challenged PICA in state court, and an Illinois state judge ruled that PICA violated the Illinois Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am by Daphne Keller
The Israeli Supreme Court recently rejected a challenge to Israel’s version of this system, in a case called Adalah v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not… [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:48 pm
Posted by Ronnie London and Sarah DuranThe United States District Court for the Western District of Washington(state) has issued a decision in Zango, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
Here, Tiffany argued that demand letters and like communication sent to eBay that stated the amount and extent of infringing product being sold on eBay constituted sufficient evidence in which to impute knowledge on eBay. [read post]