Search for: "State v. Concepcion" Results 161 - 180 of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In the case of AT & T Mobility v Concepcion, the Supreme Court ruled that a California's prohibition of allowing corporations to waive class action lawsuit rights was trumped by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 1:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
 The Court started with the rule, stated in Concepcion, that “[w]hen state law prohibits outright the arbitration of a particular type of claim ... [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
The case is yet another example where an appellate court considered the impact of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Concepcion v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:28 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Concepcion said that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that “stand[] as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purpose and objectives of [the FAA]. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Daily Journal ran a front page article today noting the confused state of California law on mandatory arbitration and class action waivers after Concepcion. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm by Steven G. Pearl
  The Supreme Court of the United States granted review and vacated that decision, remanding the case for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion 563 U.S. ___ (2011) (discussed here). [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 7:16 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Concepcion v. [read post]