Search for: "State v. D. M." Results 161 - 180 of 9,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
"I'm confident that there are many appellate judges (both state and federal), in California and elsewhere, who would have found these interactions entirely consensual, even today.But I also think there's an increasing number who would agree with Justice Moor. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:33 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
‘It is true that many cases have been filed in Munich, Mannheim, and Düsseldorf. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On January 29, 2024, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu spoke at the University of Michigan Stephen M. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
L’intimée effectue le service le même jour. [2] Elle omet d’effectuer les vérifications qui s’imposent alors qu’il n’existe aucune recommandation pour dupliquer les antiplaquettaires ainsi prescrits par ces deux cardiologues. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  In support of this very broad proposition, the CRSCC cites In re Griffin, in which Chief Justice Chase, sitting by designation, wrote that the disability “create[d]” by Section 3 is “to be made operative … by the legislation of congress in its ordinary course. [read post]