Search for: "State v. David A. King"
Results 161 - 180
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
David B. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
David B. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
Burger King Corp., 255 F. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
The Court applies the famous ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 6:47 am
Case Information: Bushman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
In 1996, David H. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
JEWELER'S BLOCK INSURANCE - BROKER'S CANCELLATION CLAUSE - PREMIUM FINANCE AGREEMENT - NEW YORK BANKING LAW § 576 - NON-COOPERATIOND&R Plaza Jewelry v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
David Laniado, of Cedarhurst, NY, represented the father. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 3:01 am
” (CPLR 3113 (d] emphasis added]) “Absent [as here] a stipulation between the parties to conduct a deposition remotely, a party seeking the remote deposition must demonstrate that the party would encounter undue hardship from submitting to an in-person deposition in New York State” (Rubin v Sabharwal, 70 Misc3d 1216[A] [Sup Ct, NY Cnty 2021] [emphasis added] citing Rogovin v Rogovin, 3 AD3d 352 [1st Dept 2004]; see Yu Hui Chen v Chen Li Zhi,… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Andrew Hamm of this blog rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s decision in King v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
Brodeur, 40 Misc 3d 1070, 1073 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2013]; People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Other coverage and commentary focus on Thursday’s decision in King v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:00 am
As stated by former Chief Justice Antonio Lamer in 1995: Does our thoroughness, at times, place substantial justice out of reach? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Clement of King & Spaulding in Washington with 10 minutes for the National Rifle Association. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
What is this for, wonders David? [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:20 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
