Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District" Results 161 - 180 of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
” According to the Supreme Court, prudential ripeness looks at “both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
  These plaintiffs had not done that—they represented to a federal district court that if their cases proceeded in state court they would be coordinated into the ongoing JCCP. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling, arguably creating tension with the Seventh Circuit’s 2022 decision in Seafarers Pension Plan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:06 pm by Cindy Cohn
This included displacing the state secrets privilege that the District Court relied upon in dismissing Jewel. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:16 pm
Judicial Council of the State of Calif., No. 02-17413 (9th Cir. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 7:44 am by Jon Sands
Fletcher with Bybee and Christen) –- The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of an Idaho state prisoner’s habeas petition, in which he challenged a death sentence imposed at resentencing following Creech v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Peter Margulies
Under court decisions interpreting the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
State, Court of Appeals No. 79A02-0603-CR-180 (Ind. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously upheld the TRO.) [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 12:11 am
  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal upheld the ruling of the District Court that the regulation exempting the discharges was invalid. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:49 am by John Jascob
The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, stating that the FTC Act limits challenges to FTC adjudications to the appellate courts. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Court grants review of two cases, likely to be among the term’s more important for business, to clarify the limits of state court personal jurisdiction when none of defendants’ actions relevant to the dispute took place in the state [Jim Beck on Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]