Search for: "State v. Dubay"
Results 161 - 180
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Ohio Judge Rules Pre-emption Still Valid Defense -- Sometimes
The American Lawyer
Ohio federal Judge Solomon Olivier Jr. has ruled that one class of state law tort claims against drug makers is still pre-empted by federal law, even after the Supreme Court's Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Dubay v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:36 pm
DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967). [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
EVID. 509 DOES NOT BAR THE GOVERNMENT FROM CALLING THE MILITARY JUDGE FROM A JUDGE-ALONE TRIAL TO TESTIFY AT A DUBAY HEARING AS TO HIS DELIBERATIVE PROCESS.United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:07 pm
WHETHER THE RECORD OF THE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORDERED PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 7:55 am
Celebrating the 'Kelo' House
Legal Times
Three years ago next week, the Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions so far this century: Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 6:12 am
CAAF's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Dubay v. [read post]
