Search for: "State v. Ege"
Results 161 - 180
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 11:56 pm
Software patents have not actually been banned, despite some excitedly explicit headlines to that effect (see eg CBC here, ZDNet here and Ars Technica here). [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Again, that production is iterative (eg it changes with each production of regulatory objects) and each iteration tests and changes the exact framing of the normative premises within which iterative"dialog" (eg through processes of consultation both among regulatory producers and the major forces of consumers of regulation--in the case of AI enterprises, civil society, and techno-bureaucracies (public, private, academic)). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:41 pm
For this judgment, it aids the Court in locating in Article 14 the right to hijras/ transgender persons to legal protection in all spheres of state activity and finding gender identity as a prohibited ground of discrimination under Articles 15 and 16. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
After Congress halted tribal treaty-making in 1871, the Court 's 1886 U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
More states are moving to restrict noncompetes In addition to California, several other states enacted new laws in 2023 that broadly limited the use of noncompetes (eg, Minnesota), raised the salary threshold for noncompetes (eg, Maryland) and restricted the use of noncompete agreements for certain employees such as physicians, mental health professionals and other health care practitioners. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
EG Sys., 639 F. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
The case is Esparaza v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:59 am
This post isn't even going to try to explain the invention and the details of the patent in its pristine and putatively amended state. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:36 am
Fenza’s Auto, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Following earlier judgment in FAPL v Sky, the judge found that both the websites infringed the Claimants' right of communication the public. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
Washington State start-up NautiGirl received a trade mark cancellation notice from global lifestyle apparel house Nautica and its parent, VF Corp. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
As an HR professional, you can assist with minimizing those liabilities long before an acquisition is being contemplated, by ensuring that: (i) well-drafted employment agreements are properly entered into; (ii) the company is protected with any necessary confidentiality, intellectual property and restrictive covenant agreements; (iii) there are no significant wages, vacation pay and overtime pay accruals; (iv) employee claims and complaints are kept to a minimum; and (v) mandatory… [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 8:40 am
Shoes: "dangerous weapons," in the Ninth.United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm
FCC Statement on Comcast v. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
Traditionally, as in Europe and, in their own way, like other systems, States have reserved to themselves some sort of a power (vested somewhere within their constitutional premise universe) an authority to protect the State against adversaries foreign and domestic in accordance with the principles and constitutional orderings of their domestic legal orders (eg here)--and in the modern era also subject to their applicable international legal obligations, when it… [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:55 pm
It was foreseeable that such state of affairs would have ended up annoying someone. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:50 am
This provision states that: "Member States shall ensure that reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity does not allow this. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
