Search for: "State v. Flow" Results 161 - 180 of 5,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:51 pm by Jeff Gittins
In July 2019, the Utah Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:40 am by tracey
Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, Landesverband Nordrhein Westfalen eV v Bezirksregierung Arnsberg, Trianel Kohlekraftwerk Lünen GmbH & Co KG, intervening (Case C-115/09);  [2011] WLR (D)  160 “A member state was precluded under article 10a of Directive 85/337/EEC from withholding, from a non-governmental organisation promoting environmental protection, the right to rely before a national court on the infringement of a rule… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  Because the judge found there was no unannounced curtailment, only a natural ‘ebb and flow’, there was nothing on which stakeholders needed to be consulted. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
Overview Today, landowners in the state have the right to drain their land with the natural flow of water and discharge excess water into natural watercourses. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:40 am by Elizabeth Kruska
Town of Newbury, State of Vermont2017 VT 117By: Kelsey BainThis case is about how to properly value flow easements for tax purposes. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am by charley foster
Thus, the dissent commented, "it appears that the mistake of the State in California v. [read post]