Search for: "State v. Garcias"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2021, 6:46 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to sever — Mutually admissible evidence A jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Rony Galicia and Edgar Garcia-Gaona, the appellants, of the first-degree murders of Shadi Najjar, age 17, and Artem Ziberov, age 18; conspiracy to murder Shadi; two counts of use of a firearm in the commission ... [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:44 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to sever — Mutually admissible evidence A jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Rony Galicia and Edgar Garcia-Gaona, the appellants, of the first-degree murders of Shadi Najjar, age 17, and Artem Ziberov, age 18; conspiracy to murder Shadi; two counts of use of a firearm in the commission ... [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:21 am
In Pedro Garcia-Hernandez, No. 19-2504 (2d Cir. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Here I will tout the work of Kristelia Garcia who has written fascinatingly about private agreements and how they interface with the statute, including sometimes by depriving artists of the royalties they might otherwise be entitled to get. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Showcased most prominently in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 8:09 am
" State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
The government’s primary counter-argument, mirroring the 6th Circuit’s rationale in Garcia-Romo v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am
Thanks to a ruling this month by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Garcia v Garcia, we can now welcome a third category of expulsion case, which we’ll dub cases involving a “naked” expulsion clause. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
” South Bay (citing Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
District Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo, which ordered the state to retain an option for “straight-ticket voting,” a 100-year old practice eliminated by a statute enacted in 2017. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Several defendants have argued strenuously that the Title III cases against them must be dismissed either because the plaintiffs do not have standing, or because the plaintiffs had failed to properly allege that the defendant companies had the necessary scienter or mental state. [read post]
