Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
Jacobs, that concerned telecommunications and utility regulators, and had nothing to do with, and never mentioned, ERISA. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:46 pm
In this podcast with Lance Jacobs, an associate with Pepper's Washington office, who focuses his practice on federal, state and local tax matters, Lance discusses the affect on taxpayers as states are imposing taxes based upon economic nexus, reviews recent cases such as West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 1:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
On that basis, Sir Robin Jacob handled the Samsung v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court decision Windsor v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court decision Windsor v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
Jacobs, placing significant limits on the scope of Younger abstention. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:17 am
Briefly: At Reason’s Hit and Run blog, Jacob Sullum writes that Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:54 pm
In Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:54 pm
In Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
A New York Appellate Court recently reversed a trial level decision granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in the 2009 case of Esther Jacobs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:35 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
In the Wall Street Journal, Chris Jacobs argues that this violates conditional spending holding of NFIB v. [read post]
