Search for: "State v. Jacobsen" Results 161 - 180 of 215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
In response to the assertion that the prenuptial agreement was invalid as improperly acknowledged, the affidavits of Donovan and Jacobsen specifically stated that each observed the document being signed, took the acknowledgment in question, and personally knew the individual signer signing before him. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 4:52 am by Andres
The judge dismissed outright the claim of copyright infringement citing the landmark decision of Jacobsen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm by Anne B. Sekel
In this regard, and as set forth in the New York City Council’s report on the amendments, the change in the law “legislatively modifies the holding of Jacobsen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Essentially, software programmers put up programming code that anyone can download, modify, use and distribute for free, as long as the "borrowed" or "open source" code is clearly indicated and enabled for the distributee to copy, download and use.On August 13, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Jacobsen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:58 am by Peter Mahler
Last month’s decision in Jacobsen v 474 3rd Owners Corp. features the reverse: a direct claim improperly pleaded as a derivative claim. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:52 am by Andres
The main decision dealing with the contract/licence dichotomy came in the US decision of Jacobsen v Katzer, where the 9th Circuit had to decide on this very legal question for the purpose of declaring the validity of the Artistic License, an open source software licence. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:52 am by Andres
The main ruling dealing with the contract/licence dichotomy came in the US decision of Jacobsen v Katzer, where the 9th Circuit had to decide on this very legal question for the purpose of declaring the validity of the Artistic License, an open source software licence. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by Susan Brenner
The mere fact he was employed by a government agency does not turn him into a part of the `law enforcement arm of the state. [read post]