Search for: "State v. Jeremy D."
Results 161 - 180
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Here's the last edition penned by Jeremy. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Where I thought we’d beA couple of weeks ago, our dear blogmeister Jeremy addressed the British Group of the Union of European Practitioners in Intellectual Property in the convivial setting of The Royal Overseas League on this topic. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
Finally, in “early February 2012”, Zahorik spoke to Sergeant Jeremy Kylen of the Galveston Police Department. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:25 am
The title -- "IP in 2015 - Where we are v Where I thought we'd be" -- is broad enough to suit all tastes and a multiplicity of interpretations. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Forcing her to abandon her Christian principles and issue licenses could never be undone, her attorney, Jonathan D. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 5:28 am
Briefly: Greenwire’s Jeremy Jacobs reports that the Court’s recent ruling in Horne v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
However, his lawyers have explicitly stated that he is selective in licensing his work. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
This was the key registration: What’s more, as its marks were UK registrations and not Community trade marks (CTMs), they were not vulnerable to the OHIM/Alicante torpedo (filing a cancellation action at OHIM against a CTM in order to frustrate an attempt later to bring infringement proceedings in a Member State, particularly the UK where any such action would likely be stayed – see the Starbucks litigation, including hereas blogged by Jeremy). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics |… [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:33 am
April 25, 2013)Lenz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
And in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
