Search for: "State v. K. A. S." Results 161 - 180 of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
Similarly, the Appellate Division held in State v Wojtkowiak that the K-55 radar device is completely reliable as a speed measuring device. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
United States where a majority of the Supreme Court ruled Arizona's controversial Immigration law a\k\a SB1070 as unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
The Court followed FN Herstal’s argumentation on the lack of inventive step and annulled H&Ks patent on that ground. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:48 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Department of State (“DOS”) has now issued FAQs for handling of same-sex spouses in both the immigrant (green card) and nonimmigrant (temporary visa) categories, following the Supreme Court’s finding, in Windsor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
  This argument can also apply to all medical device design claims, but we’re focusing on the §510(k)s because PMA devices are already protected against design claims by express preemption under Riegel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:35 am by lennyesq
“We hold that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, applicable to the states as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the type of judicial fact-finding resulting in enhanced sentences under New York’s [Persistent Felony Offender statute,” Judge Ralph K. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In 2010, Judge Brookman received the Director’s Award from United States Attorney General Eric Holder, in Washington, DC, for superior performance as an Assistant United States Attorney, for his work on the United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Indeed, the court says that Section 230(c)(2)(A) preempts all of the state law claims other than YouTube’s failure to pay. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
K-Swiss appeals the Board's decision reversing the examiner's obviousness rejection of claims 6, 7, and 11. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled on the issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
§ 52.245 under § 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, an error-correcting provision, after the EPA determined that it had mistakenly approved certain New Source Review rules in 2004 as part of California's State Implementation Plan.Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]