Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 161 - 180
of 3,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
” Falsberg v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:02 am
Michael Bindas, David K. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
First, in Silverstrand Investments v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Tersigni v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:33 pm
Why don’t you process IV interviews at every U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Moreover, the delivery note of November 14, 1997, explicitly states that it is the first delivery for mass production (Serienlieferung).Even if, as submitted by the [patent proprietor], four pistons were needed for an engine test, this would mean that more than 4000 engine tests would have been required. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Having considered the Notice dated December 13, 2011 concerning amended R 71 and new R 71a (OJ EPO 2012, 52) and the draft Guidelines, C-V 4, I tend to believe that the way in which the ED acted here is blameless, even under the new regime. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
As correctly stated in the impugned decision, the technical focus is on the use of the sulphides as solid lubricant additive in friction lining mixtures. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:04 am
Innovative Health Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
By Darren K. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
By Eric Goldman Atlantic Recording Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
If need be, an additional search would have to be performed (see Guidelines for Examination, C-III, 7.10, third paragraph, last sentence, and 7.11.1(v); decision J 3/09 [3.5.6, 5.2]), regardless of whether or not this might involve an additional effort. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:07 pm
Olsson, V. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
See T 670/95 [2], T 413/02 [3]. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, it has to be established whether this use, which constitutes a method for treatment of the human body by surgery or therapy, confers novelty to the claimed subject-matter.[3.2] According to A 54(4), it is possible to acknowledge the novelty of a “… substance or composition, comprised in the state of the art, for use in a method referred to in A 53(c), provided that its use for any such method is not comprised in the state of the art” (emphasis… [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Auld Company v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
For publication opinions today (4): Bobby Robinson a/k/a Steven Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:01 pm
The grounds of appeal read as follows: “During the OPs of May 26, 2009 the ED introduced a new document, i.e. document D5 (EP-A1-1043615).This state of the art document is essential for the decision refusing the present application.The representative requested to continue the examining procedure in written so as to give the applicant time to study document D5 and so as to have the opportunity to provide the representative with corresponding instructions how to argue against this… [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
After a lіеn hаѕ been filed, it wіll show uр on thе offender’s сrеdіt report, nеgаtіvеlу impacting аn іndіvіduаl’ѕ сrеdіt ѕсоrе and mаkіng іt dіffісult fоr hіm оr her tо secure… [read post]
