Search for: "State v. Keen"
Results 161 - 180
of 828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Most prosecutors in the U.S. enjoy absolute immunity for activities in the criminal process and as advocate for the state (Imbler v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:45 am
State, 174 N.J. 412, 417 (2002); Coffman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:13 am
” An op-ed in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) urges the Court to grant review in Spokeo v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 4:22 am
Perhaps more seriously, it could be seen as interference with property rights or even a slippery slope towards state intervention in private investment. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
” At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen also focuses on the questions drafted by the Court and suggests that the second question is “the nagging one. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
”); Keen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 8:28 am
[United Kingdom] [Habitual residence] [Petition granted] [Grave risk of harm not established]Keen, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” Briefly: At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen discusses the pending cert petition in Evans v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
He cited the cases of South Cambridgeshire District Council v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen explains why “this session could be one of the busiest in history for LGBT-related concerns. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Yes, I know, the policy says what it says, and it's primarily the insured who's required to have the requisite amount of insurance coverage, and it's possible at least in theory that the policy here could have been part of a $750,000 "package" of insurance that satisfied the statutory minimums.But I nonetheless have a very keen sense of what went on here. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
Is he right about the danger of the state? [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
If the Court is keen to preserve its subsidiary role, some better indicia for national courts and police would have been of greater assistance. [read post]
