Search for: "State v. Kemp" Results 161 - 180 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 7:55 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
Kemp, a United States Supreme Court decision decided 25 years ago, on April 22, 1987. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:18 am by Julie Lam
Neal Kemp, No. 143637, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
One of them, courtesy of the Detroit Business Law Blog, is an unpublished ruling by a Michigan intermediate appellate court last year in Schimke v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
Only the personnel of this Court did.Again, it's endemic.When the votes come out my way (as when the Ohio Supremes decided in State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Kemp, No. 113419 – (1) Is a judgment of foreclosure final and appealable, or must an appeal await a final order approving the sale and distributing the proceeds? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
In his state court proceeding raising the same issues as he raises here, 5 Schwab relied entirely on the evidence introduced in the related Lightbourne v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by Steve Hall
Kemp, a United States Supreme Court decision decided 25 years ago, on April 22, 1987. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Kent Scheidegger
  See my 2012 OSJCL article for the details on this and other studies in the area.The federal capital case of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is well settled that a criminal defendant has no statutory or constitutional right to compel a complainant to undergo a pretrial psychological examination as ruled in the landmark cases of Matter of Brown v Blumenfeld and People v Kemp. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:53 am by Phil Dixon
Readers may recall the decision in State v. [read post]