Search for: "State v. Leathers"
Results 161 - 180
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd owns the trade mark, which is registered in Singapore in Classes 9, 18 and 25 for various goods, including spectacles, leather goods, and articles of clothing. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:36 am
[iv]Juilliard v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:53 am
Fishman, a partner at Allen & Overy, and Desma Polydorou, an associate at the firm, write that in the wake of last year's Supreme Court decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:05 am
See Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
Marks applied for by Burlington Fashion GmbhProtection was sought in relation to the following classes:Class 3, including soaps for cosmetic purposes;Class 14, including jewellery and watches;Class 18, including leather and leather products; and Class 25, including footwear, clothing, headgear and belts.In response, Tulliallan submitted notices of opposition between August 2009 and August 2010 in respect of the goods in classes 3, 14 and 18. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 8:24 am
From Miyoko's Kitchen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
"Canada is not supposed to be a police state. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:38 am
" In People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
Fronczak v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:10 am
[1] United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
Since then, the company has been engaged in the manufacture, marketing and sale of fine leather and mixed-material products including handbags, wallets and accessories including eyewear, footwear, jewelry and watches. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
Sara Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
