Search for: "State v. Lo." Results 161 - 180 of 6,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 11:09 am by Meyers Nave
The Court of Appeal has published its December opinion in JSM Rivara, LLC v. the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles and the City of Los Angeles (JSM Rivara, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:35 am by Fakhimi & Associates
As Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Houman Fakhimi understands, embezzlement, under Coliseum case widens; six are charged, By Andrew Blankstein, Paul Pringle and Rong-Gong Lin II, Los Angeles Times More Blog Entries: United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The following UCL case will be heard on Wednesday, April 6, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Los Angeles:  Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The argument will take place at the Ronald Reagan State Office Building in Los Angeles. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:30 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Visita nuestro Observatorio COVID-19 en Puerto Rico El licenciado y Contador Público Autorizado (CPA), Marcos Soto Méndez, puntualizó a Microjuris.com los 10 puntos a los que habrá que prestar particular atención en la Reforma Contributiva que firmó la gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced a partir de la Ley Núm. 40 de 2020. 1. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:40 pm by Firemark Law Team
Firemark - Los Angeles Entertainment Lawyers - Theatre, Film, TV & New Media [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:02 am by Sean Hecht
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
LANDLORD WAS A BIT LATE TO THE PARTYWhen a landlord starts a summary proceeding, state law [RPAPL 735(2)] requires that the pertinent pleadings and affidavit of service be filed within three days after personal delivery or (when substituted or conspicuous-place service is utilized) after any mailings are made to the tenant.In 125 E. 50th St. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 3:38 pm
Ca (Los Angeles).Rodriguez v. [read post]