Search for: "State v. M. J. F." Results 161 - 180 of 1,881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The general practice that the court has adopted of anonymising the parties to financial remedy proceedings in its public judgments is not in accordance with the law: BT v CU at [113], A v M at [104]-[106], Xanthopoulos at [119]-[121] & [140], Gallagher at [5(vi)] & [81]. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1) applied in all its force, and it followed from the reasoning of the Strasbourg Court in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR as interpreted by the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74 that the Treasury was obliged to afford the claimant bank sufficient disclosure to enable it to give effective instructions about the essential allegations made against it. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
” The housing ‘medical advisor’ then did a ‘report’ (though containing little by way of medical assessment) which stated: “I’m surprised to see [the 5 June 2017] letter requesting rehousing, which seems somewhat at odds with her (sic) own full C&F report of 5 Jun 2017 in which she (sic) states: ‘the actual property seems appropriate as per Housing team’s description’. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Elenis, (68 Saint Louis University Law Journal, 2024).Andrew M. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smolin, Kids Are Not Cakes: A Children's Rights Perspective on Fulton v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]