Search for: "State v. Market" Results 161 - 180 of 25,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
If a government official identifies themselves as such on their account, but lacks the authority to act on behalf of the state, there is no state action. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:02 am by Dennis Crouch
The court emphasized that jurisdiction will lie only where the defendant “targeted a forum state by identifying listings for removal that, if removed, affect the marketing, sales, or other activities in that state. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Maritas * 512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
The last four months in the DSA news feel like two years. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 CommentThis decision will provide some reassurance to owners of famous or iconic marks who may have experienced, due to market conditions outside of their control, a down-tick in sales over a period of time, that market share is not the only factor which determines the reputation of a mark. [read post]