Search for: "State v. Michael" Results 161 - 180 of 12,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2008, 9:42 am
At the AEI event Ted discussed earlier, preemption scholar Michael Greve argued that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Riegel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:07 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Here is a link to the hearing page for United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
   That “Big Business federalism” dates to the late nineteenth century, when interstate businesses argued for broad dormant Commerce Clause limits on state regulation, substitution of general commercial law principles for state common law under Swift v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dodge (state court tort suit) 8-13-19-first-amended-complaint.pdf Doucette v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Levy said it is too soon to say whether Toney will be retried.The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
On December 8, 2015, the Second Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:34 pm by Reproductive Rights
Contributors include Professors Michael Dorf, Gillian Metzger, Kevin Walsh, Reva Siegel and Linda Greenhouse, Misha Tseytlin, Solicitor General of the State of Wisconsin, and Mailee... [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Out-of-court identification Wayne Bell, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of robbery of Constance Pohl and assault of Michael Speights, who witnessed the robbery and chased appellant. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am by Amanda Frost
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:41 pm by Howard Wasserman
Drumpf (really, you cannot make this stuff up): Michael Dorf has a typically excellent analysis of the decision to sue in state rather than federal court He concludes that it was a strategic blunder, given the risk of a presidential immunity in state court. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:07 pm by Dale Burmeister
Matthews, MD, PC v Harleysville Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division, Case No. 18-11659, Hon. [read post]