Search for: "State v. Miner"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 1:16 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:21 pm
Weber v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
Pel-State sent Shell a notice that the contractor was not paying for the sub’s work and then perfected a mineral lien. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
After reviewing other authority, the Corpus Christi court concluded that, contrary to Mapco, “the well-recognized, decisional law states that the mineral estate owner owns the minerals but not the subsurface. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:13 am
In Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:34 am
United States was whether certain mineral related transactions between Exxon and the countries of Qatar and Malaysia were sales or leases. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 7:56 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
Next post: Which states apply Duhig? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:19 pm
Akchin On Friday, April 9, 2010, the Louisiana Supreme Court (1) reversed the Third Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision in Cimarex Energy Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Its principal place of business is Texas and was organized to acquire and own mineral interests in states other than Texas. [read post]
1 May 2010, 2:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:11 am
United States (N.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
In Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:58 am
August 13, 2010) (Miner, Cabranes, Wesley, CJJ)Five months ago, in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
